據(jù)許昌日?qǐng)?bào)消息，近日，按照“五一”節(jié)期間工作安排，結(jié)合網(wǎng)絡(luò)上關(guān)于許昌胖東來(lái)銷售和田玉有關(guān)情況的反映，許昌市市場(chǎng)監(jiān)督管理局魏都區(qū)分局對(duì)時(shí)代廣場(chǎng)銷售和田玉的胖東來(lái)唯初珠寶有限公司開展了日常檢查?，F(xiàn)場(chǎng)查閱了2025年1至4月份銷售的和田玉數(shù)量和價(jià)格情況，并隨機(jī)抽查了在售的13件和田玉商品的進(jìn)銷貨相關(guān)手續(xù)。
A regulatory inspection into Chinese supermarket chain Pangdonglai has found no evidence of excessive markups on its jade products, countering allegations by a social media influencer who accused the retailer of profiteering. The findings, released by the Weidu district branch of the Xuchang Municipal Market Supervision and Administration Bureau, come amid a heated legal battle between Pangdonglai and Douyin influencer "Chai Duidui" over claims of commercial slander.
經(jīng)檢查，許昌市胖東來(lái)唯初珠寶有限公司2025年1至4月份共銷售和田玉商品4177件，銷售金額2959.2175萬(wàn)元，平均毛利率不超過(guò)20%；目前在售和田玉商品均按規(guī)定明碼標(biāo)價(jià)；被隨機(jī)抽查的在售13件和田玉商品進(jìn)貨手續(xù)齊全，進(jìn)貨臺(tái)賬完備，鑒定機(jī)構(gòu)具有合法資質(zhì)，鑒定證書有效。
According to a report by Xuchang Daily, authorities conducted a routine check of Pangdonglai's jewelry subsidiary, Weichu Jewelry Co, Ltd, after online discussions questioned the pricing of its Hetian jade products. The inspection revealed that from January to April 2025, the company sold 4,177 Hetian jade items totaling 29.59 million yuan, with an average gross profit margin below 20%. Random checks of 13 in-stock jade products confirmed compliance with pricing regulations, complete sourcing documentation, and valid certifications from accredited appraisal agencies.
圖源：許昌日?qǐng)?bào)
近日，網(wǎng)紅“柴懟懟”在短視頻平臺(tái)稱，胖東來(lái)以低成本從玉石獲取暴利、“幾百塊的東西賣幾千幾萬(wàn)”，并公開貶低胖東來(lái)的產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量。
The controversy began when influencer Chai Duidui alleged in viral videos that Pangdonglai was selling jade products worth "hundreds of yuan for thousands or tens of thousands" and criticized their quality. The claims, which described jade as the retailer's "core profit driver", sparked widespread debate online, challenging Pangdonglai's reputation for transparency and ethical business practices.
胖東來(lái)4月8日發(fā)布針對(duì)“柴懟懟”等3起網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)的回復(fù)說(shuō)明。4月30日，胖東來(lái)公布受理案件通知書，顯示關(guān)于起訴“柴懟懟商業(yè)詆毀、侵犯名譽(yù)權(quán)”一案，已于4月25日在許昌市中級(jí)人民法院立案。
Pangdonglai denied the accusations in an April 8 statement, calling them "unfounded and malicious". On April 30, the company announced that the Xuchang Intermediate People's Court had accepted its lawsuit against Chai Duidui for "commercial defamation and reputational damage".
5月3日，胖東來(lái)創(chuàng)始人于東來(lái)曾表示，如果不讓“柴懟懟”這種隨意污蔑傷害他人的行為受到應(yīng)有的處罰，“我會(huì)主動(dòng)關(guān)閉或永遠(yuǎn)離開胖東來(lái)這個(gè)企業(yè)”。
Founder Yu Donglai said on Saturday that he would "voluntarily shut down or permanently step away from Pangdonglai" if such "unfounded defamation" were not legally rectified.
5月3日，“抖音黑板報(bào)”公告稱，近日，胖東來(lái)創(chuàng)始人于東來(lái)對(duì)抖音用戶“柴懟懟”提出投訴，經(jīng)審核，被投訴人“柴懟懟”近期視頻中有29條視頻涉嫌侵權(quán)（包括在無(wú)充分事實(shí)舉證情況下，發(fā)布關(guān)于“胖東來(lái)的核心盈利點(diǎn)，在玉上……幾百塊的東西賣幾千幾萬(wàn)”，“組織水軍吹捧、造神”等信息），均予以下架，根據(jù)《抖音社區(qū)自律公約》，限制賬號(hào)投稿權(quán)限一個(gè)月。平臺(tái)將持續(xù)關(guān)注相關(guān)賬號(hào)，如其在處置期后進(jìn)一步發(fā)布涉嫌侵權(quán)內(nèi)容，將升級(jí)處置。
Douyin intervened on May 3 by removing 29 of Chai Duidui's videos, citing violations of community guidelines. The platform accused the influencer of making unsubstantiated claims about Pangdonglai's pricing and falsely alleging the retailer had "organized paid supporters to promote its image". Chai Duidui's account was restricted for one month, with Douyin pledging to adjust penalties based on future court rulings.
公告稱，鑒于胖東來(lái)稱已起訴被投訴人，平臺(tái)將參考裁決結(jié)果進(jìn)一步處理。如法院判決被投訴人發(fā)布內(nèi)容屬實(shí)且不涉嫌侵權(quán)，被投訴人可向平臺(tái)申訴解除處罰。
來(lái)源：許昌日?qǐng)?bào) 長(zhǎng)安街知事
China Daily精讀計(jì)劃
每天20分鐘，英語(yǔ)全面提升！
熱門跟貼